Fig 1 - The binary system propyl mercaptan – water

OLI Systems’ software provides the thermodynamic underpinning for modeling how foul-smelling mercaptans can be removed from hydrocarbon streams by utilising caustics, and is a dramatic improvement over an alternative, experimental-based design, write Jiangping Liu and Dr Samir Ujam

 

Processing various sources of crude oils leads to increased sulfur carryover to desulfurisation and demercaptanisation units in refineries.

In order to meet product ultra-low sulfur specifications and for environmental compliance, the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) treatment plant has an essential role in a refinery regardless of the declining margin of the product itself.

The Merox Process is a proprietary UOP technology dating back to 1958 that selectively sweetens petroleum products by oxidising mercaptans into the sweeter disulfides, which remain in the product, leaving the total sulfur content the same.

The treatment process, sometimes known as a sweetening process, involves liquid-liquid extraction of the mercaptan (RSH) in LPG with a caustic solution and is much cheaper to install than a hydrotreater, which actually lowers the sulfur content.

The resultant disulfides are separated and the caustic is reused for extraction. The sulfur content of the extracted hydrocarbon is reduced.


MERCAPTAN CHEMISTRY & CHALLENGES

Mercaptan, or thiol, is a sulfur-based component that is naturally occurring in both crude oil and natural gas, mainly as an impurity.

It is analogous to an alcohol in chemical structure, and is similar to it in physical and chemical properties.

Mercaptan, a sulfur equivalent of an alcohol, has the generic formula, R-SH, where R represents an alkyl or other organic group. The combination of this R-SH group gives the mercaptan molecule very distinct chemical and physical properties.

It has a particularly foul odour, and is more acidic character compared to its alcohol counterparts due to the sulfur atom’s stabilising effect.

Fig 2 - Propyl mercaptan and butyl mercaptan partition coefficients
in water-isooctane

Mercaptans, however, are only slightly acidic, and this acidity is reduced as the molecular weight of the mercaptan increases.

Relative to alcohols, mercaptans are more acidic. Therefore, mercaptanate salts can be created by treating mercaptans with alkali hydroxides, such as NaOH.

Furthermore, unlike hydrogen sulfide, mercaptans can come in many different forms, such as methyl mercaptan, ethyl mercaptan, propyl mercaptan, butyl mercaptan and other branched and more complicated variations.

All these mercaptans in lighter feeds are converted to disulfides, which remain in the sweetened hydrocarbon product in an alkaline environment.

In addition, mercaptan has weaker intermolecular forces; it shows little association by hydrogen bonding with water molecules or among itself.

Fig 3 - Propyl and butyl mercaptan partition coefficients in NaOH
solution-isooctane

Mercaptan has a lower boiling point and is less soluble in water and other polar solvents than alcohols of similar molecular weight. Therefore, mercaptan will have higher equilibrium vapour pressure and will be more soluble in hydrocarbon phases. Due to a lower boiling point, some mercaptans are also gaseous at ambient conditions.

A knowledge of the thermodynamic properties and vapour-liquid equilibria (VLE), vapour-liquid-liquid equilibria (VLLE) of all kinds of mercaptans and disulfides with water and hydrocarbons as well as partitioning of mercaptans in water and hydrocarbon solvents is important because it ensures high mercaptan extraction efficiency, low re-entry of disulfide in the treated products and maximum desulfurisation with a minimum caustic circulate rate.


OLI SYSTEMS ELIMINATE TOXIC CONTAMINATION

OLI Systems’ software provides the thermodynamic underpinning for modeling how mercaptans can be removed from hydrocarbon streams by utilising caustics. It is a dramatic improvement over an alternative, experimental-based design.

The simulation technology, which is based on its proprietary Mixed Solvent Electrolyte (MSE) model, is available in OLI Studio V11, OLI Flowsheet ESP V11, OLI Cloud APIs and other OLI software products.

The MSE thermodynamic model includes the relevant hydroxides, C1-C7 mercaptans and disulfides, and various light and heavy hydrocarbons as well as the interactions between mercaptans, disulfides and hydrocarbons.

Knowledge of the phase behaviour of systems involving mercaptans and water is necessary to help remove mercaptans from raw natural gas and LPG.

As mercaptans are found in very small quantities in crude oil or natural gas streams, the Henry’s law approach is generally used. By definition, the Henry’s law coefficient is defined at infinite dilution.

The Henry’s law constant is directly related to the residual chemical potential of the solute at infinite dilution, which is evaluated from the intermolecular potential between one solute molecule and one solvent molecule.

Limiting activity coefficient is directly determined from Henry’s law coefficient.

There are estimation methods to calculate infinite dilution activity coefficients, but these are inadequate in the absence of consistent thermodynamic data.

On the other hand, experimental measurements are expensive and time-consuming especially at extremely low concentrations.

Here, the MSE thermodynamic framework in the OLI Software Platform V11 can accurately predict solubility of mercaptans in water and water solubility in mercaptans.

Fig 1 shows vapour-liquid-liquid equilibrium (VLLE) of propyl mercaptan with water at 1 atm.

Because of the partial miscibility, VLE, liquid-liquid equilibrium (LLE), and VLLE are present on the phase diagram.

The concentrations of each phase are calculated and are in good agreement with the experimental data. As temperature increases, the solubility of propyl mercaptan in water increases. In the organic phase, the solubility of water in propyl mercaptan also increases.

Modeling of the process requires the knowledge of the behaviour of sulfur compounds in hydrocarbons. Information on such systems is scarce.

OLI Software Platform V11 has more than 26 pairs of C1-C7 mercaptans with hydrocarbons as wells as estimations of C1-C10 n-alkanes with all these mercaptans.

In a liquid-liquid extraction process, the overall distribution of a mercaptans between an oil phase and an immiscible alkaline solution is dependent upon two equilibrium factors: the partition of the non-neutralised mercaptan between the two phases; and, the hydrolysis of the mercaptide in the alkaline phase.

Fig 2 shows two mercaptan partition coefficients in water with isooctane solution without caustic. Kp is the partition coefficient of the non-neutralised mercaptan between the aqueous and oil phases. It is proportional to the solubility of the non-neutralised mercaptan in the aqueous phase.

In Fig 2, Kp of propyl mercaptan is larger than that of butyl mercaptan’s. It is apparent that an increase in molecular weight of mercaptan causes a great drop in the water solubility and in the partition of the mercaptan between isooctane and water.

The lighter mercaptans are more readily extracted than the heavier mercaptans. In addition, Kp increases as temperature increases which means higher temperature will improve extraction mercaptans from water and isooctane solution.


EFFECT OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE CONCENTRATION

Kq, the over-all mercaptan distribution constant, is of fundamental importance since it may be used to calculate the extent of mercaptan removal from gasoline under specified conditions, such as caustic gasoline volume ratio.

It is obvious that the higher the value of Kq, the more complete is the extraction of the mercaptan from the oil phase by the aqueous alkaline phase.

A comparison of Fig 2 and Fig 3 shows that the over-all extraction constant, Kq, becomes larger in the presence of sodium hydroxide.

Propyl mercaptan has a larger Kq than butyl mercaptan which the same trend as in Fig. 2.

An increase in the sodium hydroxide concentration improves the extraction of mercaptans but not in proportion to the increased hydroxide concentration. This is due to the salting-out of the unneutralised mercaptan from the aqueous phase by the NaOH.


EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE & ‘SOLUTISERS’

The effect of temperature on extraction of mercaptan is to increase Kq appreciably as the temperatures decrease. A decrease in the extraction temperature increases the degree of removal of mercaptans from the oil phase.